jul 23 2004
standards?
[whispers] web standards [/whispers]. i'm afraid to mention it too loudly... damien and charl have been having quite a debate about it recently.
so anyway, being curious as to how phunkd ranked, i ran it through a standard validator, the result:
this page is not valid html 4.01 transitional!
the initial result was a pretty sloppy page. i quickly fixed all that i could with the exception of some dodgy labels on the poll include. now i must say i am happy with 8 errors rather than 61 (ouch!). geez, i think i better start getting better at web standards if i wanna call myself a good web developer!
update: after some tweaking, my site is valid html 4.01 transitional now. yippee! i can put a button somewhere... double yippee!
Posted by sarah | web
comments
sarah | 2004-07-26 10:10:11
coda | 2004-07-23 17:28:13